Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is way better than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's general score of 72.6. The Galaxy Z Flip design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's, but it is also a bit heavier. Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better screen than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a quite higher pixels density, a little bit larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Asus ZenFone 5Q.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Asus ZenFone 5Q. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Asus ZenFone 5Q, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.