Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Asus ZenFone 5Q, getting a 94.6 score against 72.6. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than Asus ZenFone 5Q, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. Asus ZenFone 5Q and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit worse pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a larger screen.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Asus ZenFone 5Q, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has a way lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Asus ZenFone 5Q. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Asus ZenFone 5Q, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.