Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Q70 is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 5z, getting a global score of 77.9 against 75.3. The LG Q70 is a newer cellphone than the Asus ZenFone 5z, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The Asus ZenFone 5z features a little better performance than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a greater amount of RAM.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a little more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. Asus ZenFone 5z features a superior memory for applications and games than LG Q70, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG Q70 captures much clearer photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor giving a worse image quality, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture. LG Q70 features superior battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG Q70 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.