Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| 2018-06-13 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 5z's general score of 75.3. LG V35 ThinQ's body is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Asus ZenFone 5z, even though they were released only 0 months apart. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better display pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a processing unit that is very similar to Asus ZenFone 5z's processor, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture.
The Asus ZenFone 5z features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ZenFone 5z and LG V35 ThinQ both count with very similar batteries performance.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.