Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is better than Asus ZenFone 5z's 75.3 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is much newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than Asus ZenFone 5z. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and much more brightness.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features improved battery life than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.