Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Power is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 5z, getting a overall score of 76.1 against 75.3. Although Motorola Moto G Power is newer than the Asus ZenFone 5z, it is way thicker and somewhat heavier. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a slightly better display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2246px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density.
Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has 4 GB more RAM. Asus ZenFone 5z features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto G Power has a way better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Moto G Power features a way better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 52% more battery size.
The Moto G Power not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.