Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-13 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone 5z, getting a general score of 75.8 against 75.3. Moto Z Force is an older cellphone than the Asus ZenFone 5z, but Motorola was able to make it just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit sharper screen than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display density.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Asus ZenFone 5z features much more storage for applications and games than Moto Z Force, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has more internal memory capacity.
Moto Z Force takes way better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit better battery life than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Moto Z Force is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.