Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| 2018-06-13 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 5z's 75.3 global score. The Motorola One Action design is newer than the Asus ZenFone 5z's, but it's somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, a just a little worse display pixel density and a bit smaller display.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola One Action, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 5z has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One Action has a way better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has slower video frame rate, they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality. The Motorola One Action has just a bit better battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Motorola One Action not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.