Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 has a global score of 76.1, which is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 5z's general score of 75.3. Although Galaxy A22 is extremely newer than Asus ZenFone 5z, it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Asus ZenFone 5z features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 5z has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2246 resolution and a higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A22 captures much better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z. Both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality.
Asus ZenFone 5z has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.