Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2018-06-13 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than Asus ZenFone 5z's 75.3 overall score. Galaxy A50's construction has the same thickness than the Asus ZenFone 5z, but it's a little bit heavier. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a little worse 1080 x 2246px resolution, a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit smaller screen.
The Asus ZenFone 5z has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with improved battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.