Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than Asus ZenFone 5z, with a global score of 85.5 against 75.3. Even though Galaxy A51 is newer than the Asus ZenFone 5z, it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Asus ZenFone 5z features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 5z features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution and a quite worse pixel density. The Galaxy A51 counts with a greater camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A51, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A51 has longer battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.