Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 5z's score of 75.3. The Galaxy A51 5G is a newer phone than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a bit worse display pixels density, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2246 resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 5z features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features longer battery life than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.