Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2018-06-13 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than the Asus ZenFone 5z's 75.3 global score. Even though Galaxy A52 is much newer than Asus ZenFone 5z, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Asus ZenFone 5z has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a larger amount of RAM.
Asus ZenFone 5z has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little bit smaller screen. The Asus ZenFone 5z has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 takes way better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.