Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-13 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C5 has a global score of 76.4, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 5z's general score of 75.3. Samsung Galaxy C5 is an a lot older phone than the Asus ZenFone 5z, but Samsung managed to make it thinner and lighter. Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C5, because although it has a little lower pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2246px resolution.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy C5 captures greater photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 5z features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone 5z features better battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.