Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Asus ZenFone 5z's overall score of 75.3. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is a lot newer than Asus ZenFone 5z's, although it is thicker and notably heavier. Asus ZenFone 5z features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density and a little bit more brightness. The Asus ZenFone 5z features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.