Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 5z's global score of 75.3. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a much older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than the Asus ZenFone 5z. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller display.
The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone 5z has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images and a smaller aperture, they both have the same video quality.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.