Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 5z, with an 81 score against 75.3. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than the Asus ZenFone 5z, although it is heavier and notably thicker. Asus ZenFone 5z has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a higher amount of RAM.
Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little smaller screen, a quite lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density. The Galaxy XCover Pro captures greater videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Asus ZenFone 5z has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.