Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than Asus ZenFone 5z, getting a global score of 90.6 against 75.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Asus ZenFone 5z. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has a tinier aperture.
The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with greater battery life than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.