Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-13 | -- |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 5z's 75.3 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is a lot thinner but way heavier than Asus ZenFone 5z. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better display than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a better 1968 x 2184 resolution, a bigger display and a really brighter display.
Asus ZenFone 5z features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes a lot better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z. They have a F1.8 diafragm aperture. Asus ZenFone 5z has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has only 256 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features greater battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Asus ZenFone 5z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Asus ZenFone 5z. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Asus ZenFone 5z, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.