Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-25 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s construction is notably newer and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.