Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-25 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s 77.8 overall score. Even though the Galaxy S9 is older than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), it's construction is lighter and a bit thinner. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 features a bit sharper screen than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.