Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), with an 81 score against 77.8. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give very similar operating system features. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a heavier and a little thicker phone.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures, a much higher video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.