Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.11 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora black and Pastel white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has a score of 88.3, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Asus ZenFone 7 Pro's design is notably thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 7 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.