Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-12-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Asus ZenFone Max (M2), with an 81.3 score against 71.6. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), even though both were only released with a couple months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Asus ZenFone Max (M2), they have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone Max (M2) counts with improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.