Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-12-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is better than the Asus ZenFone Max (M2)'s score of 71.6. The Galaxy A50 is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the Asus ZenFone Max (M2), but they are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone Max (M2). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a more vivid display than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because it has a much greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Asus ZenFone Max (M2) counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery lifetime in Asus ZenFone Max (M2).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.