Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than the Asus ZenFone Max (M2)'s score of 71.6. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Asus ZenFone Max (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is newer than Asus ZenFone Max (M2)'s, although it's much heavier and incredibly thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max (M2). Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy XCover Pro features a more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has way more pixels per display inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
The Asus ZenFone Max (M2) has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone Max (M2) also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better battery life than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because it has a 1 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.