Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s 73.1 overall score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but LG Q70 has older 10 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG Q70 construction is incredibly newer and just a little thinner than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s, although it's just a bit heavier.
LG Q70 features a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
The LG Q70 features a much better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also has a much better 32 MP resolution back facing camera, higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography. LG Q70's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has greater battery life than LG Q70, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG Q70, else you can save some dollars and get the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.