Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s score of 73.1. The LG Velvet is a a little thinner phone than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but both weight 6.35oz. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The LG Velvet has a bit superior CPU than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM. LG Velvet captures greater pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also has a larger aperture for better low-light photos, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
LG Velvet features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
LG Velvet is more expensive than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.