Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-05-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s score of 73.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z Force has older 7.0 Nougat version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto Z Force is an older device than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but Motorola made it a little bit lighter and thinner.
The Moto Z Force features just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount. The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better looking display than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
Moto Z Force features a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger aperture, a back facing camera with way more MP and faster 30 fps video frame rate. The Moto Z Force's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) one, both have the same 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a very superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs more than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.