Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s score of 73.1. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the older 11 version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a noticeably newer device than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a bit better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G's battery performance is just as good as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.