Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is slightly better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s 73.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G construction is notably newer and just a bit thinner, but heavier than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the older 14 version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, less brightness and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A35 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A35 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.