Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), getting an 83.8 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is newer, just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A50 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has higher video frame rates, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.