Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), having a global score of 85.5 against 73.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A51 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and a bit thinner than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1).
The Galaxy A51 features a bit superior processor than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a little smaller screen.
Galaxy A51 captures way better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 also has a camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a lot more expensive than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.