Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), having an 88.1 score against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is incredibly newer than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM memory. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) and Samsung Galaxy F62 both count with similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has less brightness and a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy F62 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, faster video frame rates and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.