Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), with an 87.7 score against 73.1. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy M51 is a way newer phone than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but it's thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit better CPU than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Galaxy M51 counts with a lot better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has higher video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a 40 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.