Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), getting a overall score of 90.8 against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction has the same thickness than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but it's a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a camera with a lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.