Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s global score of 73.1. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably newer than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), it's a lot heavier and a bit thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid display than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a bit larger screen, much more brightness, a little better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a larger camera aperture, a way better video definition and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). If you want to save some money, you can get Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.