Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-03 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), having a score of 90.7 against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is a lot lighter and incredibly thinner than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a much brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher display pixels density.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a back-facing camera with a way better 200 mega pixels resolution, a lot larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery duration that's very similar to the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.