Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-05-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), getting an 80.1 score against 73.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an older 8.0 Oreo version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), although it's notably heavier and extremely thicker.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better display than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better screen density.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a more MP camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.