Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-12-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s 77.4 overall score. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is just a bit lighter and thinner than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), even though they were released only 6 months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2). They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The LG V35 ThinQ takes slightly better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a camera with a much higher 16 MP resolution.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has 64 GB more internal memory. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a much better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.