Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-11 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), having a general score of 85.5 against 77.4. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A51 design is newer, just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2).
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little bit lower display pixels density. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a processor that is very similar to Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s CPU, and although the Galaxy A51 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a way better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.