Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), getting a global score of 98 against 77.4. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer, but a little bit thicker and much heavier than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2).
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because it has a greater number of pixels per display inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor, a way better video definition and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.