Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s 77.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is newer than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s, but it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a quite worse pixels number per inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, they both have a same size screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.