Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), having a overall score of 88.5 against 77.4. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2).
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same resolution camera in the back and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.