Compare phones
Samsung B3310
GT-B3310| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 36.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| AT&T | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-08-24 |
| 4.37 x 1.84 x 0.56 inches | 3.58 x 2.13 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.68 ounces | 3.56 ounces |
| $ 50.00 | $ 49.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 461 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 380 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1 |
Comparison review
Samsung B3310 is way better than the AT&T U2800A, having a 36.9 score against 25.5. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, Samsung B3310's design is thicker and notably heavier than AT&T U2800A. The AT&T U2800A and the Samsung B3310 have extremely similar processors, both of them have 0 processing cores.
The Samsung B3310 features a much better looking screen than AT&T U2800A, because it has a lot higher resolution of 320 x 240px, a bit bigger display and a much better count of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung B3310 and AT&T U2800A have quite similar storage for apps and games. AT&T U2800A has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung B3310, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity against 800mAh.
The Samsung B3310 shoots a lot better videos and photos than AT&T U2800A.
The Samsung B3310 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.