Compare phones
Samsung Helio Fin
SPH-A513| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 38 |
| Basic Information | |
| AT&T | Samsung |
| -- | 2007-08-15 |
| 4.37 x 1.84 x 0.56 inches | 4.06 x 2.04 x 0.45 inches |
| 2.68 ounces | 3.35 ounces |
| $ 50.00 | $ 50.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2.3 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 174 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 102,4 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.6 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 3.00 MP |
| 0 | 5.06 |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 461 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Samsung Helio Fin is a lot better than the AT&T U2800A, with a global score of 38 against 25.5. The Samsung Helio Fin is a incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner phone than AT&T U2800A. Samsung Helio Fin features a processing unit that's just as good as AT&T U2800A's CPU, they have 0 cores. Samsung Helio Fin features a better looking display than AT&T U2800A, because it has a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a larger display.
The Samsung Helio Fin captures much better photos and videos than AT&T U2800A. Samsung Helio Fin counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than AT&T U2800A. AT&T U2800A counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Helio Fin, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity against 800mAh.
Samsung Helio Fin and the AT&T U2800A cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.