Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 35.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| AT&T | Samsung |
| -- | 2008-02-11 |
| 4.37 x 1.84 x 0.56 inches | 3.91 x 1.88 x 0.58 inches |
| 2.68 ounces | 3.24 ounces |
| $ 50.00 | $ 50.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 461 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung SGH-J700 is a lot better than the AT&T U2800A, getting a 35.7 score against 25.5. Samsung SGH-J700's body is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the AT&T U2800A. The Samsung SGH-J700 counts with a processor that's just as good as the AT&T U2800A one, both have the same number of cores.
AT&T U2800A has a bit more vivid display than Samsung SGH-J700, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 160 x 128 resolution, the AT&T U2800A also counts with a little higher pixels quantity in each screen inch. Samsung SGH-J700 features a greater camera than AT&T U2800A.
The Samsung SGH-J700 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than AT&T U2800A. The AT&T U2800A has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung SGH-J700, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
The Samsung SGH-J700 and the AT&T U2800A cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.