Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.1 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 8.0 |
| -- | 2004-06-14 |
| 3.29 x 1.77 x 0.91 inches | 4.33 x 2.36 x 0.81 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 4.47 ounces |
| $ 779.00 | $ 269.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| -- | 220 x 176 video resolution |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| GPRS and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 180 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 264 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 6630 has a global score of 28.6, which is slightly better than the BenQ A500's 26.1 score. The Nokia 6630 is a thinner but incredibly heavier phone than the BenQ A500. BenQ A500 has just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 6630, although it has a lot worse resolution of 160 x 128 pixels.
The BenQ A500 and the Nokia 6630 feature very similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. BenQ A500 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 6630, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 20,48 MB internal storage.
Nokia 6630 features better battery performance than BenQ A500, because it has a 900mAh battery size against 700mAh. Nokia 6630 captures way better videos and photos than BenQ A500, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Nokia 6630 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.