Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.1 | 28.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0s |
| -- | 2004-09-28 |
| 3.29 x 1.77 x 0.91 inches | 4.27 x 2.08 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 4.16 ounces |
| $ 779.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 8,19 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.29 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 180 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 6670 is a little bit better than the BenQ A500, with a 28.4 score against 26.1. The Nokia 6670 construction is just a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than BenQ A500. Nokia 6670 has a CPU that is just as good as the BenQ A500 one, both of them have 0 CPU cores. The BenQ A500 counts with a little more vivid display than Nokia 6670, although it has a way worse resolution of 160 x 128px.
The Nokia 6670 takes much clearer photographs and videos than BenQ A500, because it has a camera with lot more MP. The BenQ A500 features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 6670, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Nokia 6670 features improved battery lifetime than BenQ A500, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Nokia 6670 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.