Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.7 | 28.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-02-12 |
| 3.25 x 1.76 x 0.89 inches | 4.25 x 1.73 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 2.75 ounces |
| $ 220.00 | $ 129.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| OLED | STN |
| -- | 79 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | 1,02 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 10.9 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.32 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W205 is slightly better than the BenQ A520, having a general score of 28.1 against 25.7. Motorola W205's construction is noticeably thinner and lighter than the BenQ A520. Motorola W205 features an incredibly better looking screen than BenQ A520. Both have an equal 128 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola W205 has as much storage to install applications and games as the BenQ A520, although the Motorola W205 has just 1,02 MB internal storage capacity. The Motorola W205 features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in BenQ A520, both have a 0-Core CPU. BenQ A520 takes greater videos and photos than Motorola W205.
Motorola W205 features longer battery performance than BenQ A520, because it has 850mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola W205 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.